Previous Page  72 / 245 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 72 / 245 Next Page
Page Background

72

· DOS Abstracts

Reoperation after long and short intra medullary nail

in patients with per- and subtrochanteric fracture.

Lasse Eriksen, Frederik Højsager, Katia Damsgaard Bomholt, Søren Overgaard,

Jens Lauritsen, Bjarke Viberg

Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Department

of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital

Background:

Short (SIMN) and long Intramedullary Nails (LIMN) are frequently

used in the management of femoral pertrochanteric (Pfx) and subtrochanteric

fractures (Sfx) but the literature is scarce on the optimal choice regarding re-

operations. The motivation for use of LIMN in Pfx has been prophylaxis for new

fractures distal to a short nail.

Purpose / Aim of Study:

To compare reoperation proportions between SIMN

and LIMN in patients with Pfx and Sfx.

Materials and Methods:

From 2008–2013 data on 8.516 hip fractures in the

Region of Southern Denmark was retrieved from the Danish Multidisciplinary

Registry for Hip Fractures (DMRHF). 1.419 patients with the procedure codes

KNFJ51-52 were included. Data from DMRHF includes age, sex, Charlsons

Comorbidity Index (CCI), and reoperations within 2 years. All health records

were reviewed for type of IMN and fracture near the IMN (fxIMN). Proportions

of reoperation and crude and age/sex/CCI adjusted Odds Ratios (OR) from lo-

gistic regression comparing SIMN and LIMN are given with 95% Confidence in-

tervals.

Findings / Results:

There were 807 patients with Pfx and 612 with Sfx. The

median age was 84.8 years and 70.6% were female with no differences be-

tween groups. Pfx reoperation level for SIMN was 5.6% (3.7;8.0) (27/483 – 3

fxIMN) compared to 8.0% (5.3;11.5) (26/324 – 4 fxIMN) for LIMNs. Crude

OR = 1.47 (0.84;2.57), adjusted OR = 1.56 (0.89;2.74) comparing LIMN to

SIMN. Sfx reoperation level for SIMN was 10.8% (7.0;15.8) (23/213 – 5 fx-

IMN) compared to 6.0% (3.9;8.8) (24/399 – 2 fxIMN) for LIMN. Crude OR

= 0.52 (0.29;0.96), adjusted OR =0.49 (0.26;0.9) comparing LIMN to SIMN.

Conclusions:

This is the largest study to date showing no difference between

SIMN and LIMN for Pfx but an increased risk of reoperation for Sfx managed

with SIMNs. Thus there seems to be no indication for use of long nails in Pfx as

a routine.

No conflicts of interest reported

23.