

DOS Kongressen 2017 ·
199
The Influence of Tibial Slope on ACL Graft Failure
Risk is Dependent on Graft Positioning
Steffen Sauer, Robert English, Mark Clatworthy
Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Middle more Hospital / Auckland /
New Zealand
Background:
Increased lateral tibial posterior slope (LTPS) is associated with
higher ACL reconstruction (ACLR) failure rate. Transportal central femoral foot-
print ACLR is associated with higher failure rate compared to transtibial high
anteromedial footprint ACLR due to graft anisometry.
Purpose / Aim of Study:
The purpose of this study was to investigate wheth-
er the influence of tibial slope on ACL graft failure risk is dependent on graft
positioning.
Materials and Methods:
Out of 1480 consecutive hamstring ACL reconstruc-
tions, 30 transportal (central femoral tunnel placement) and 30 transtibial (high
anteromedial tunnel placement) ACLR failures were evaluated and matched
one- to-one with non-failure control participants by age, sex, graft and sur-
gical technique. Lateral tibial slope was assessed on MRI using the technique
described by Hashemi.
Findings / Results:
The risk of graft failure in the transportal group increased
by 40.5 percent per degree of increasing LTPS (odds ratio 1.4; 95% CI, 1,05 -
1,87; p=.02). The transportal failure group showed a significantly higher mean
tibial slope of 8.6 degrees compared to both the transportal control group with
7.1 degrees (p=.03) and the transtibial failure group with 7.2 degrees (p=.04).
Increased tibial slope was associated with shorter time to reconstruction failure
(p=.002). The difference between slopes in the transtibial failure group (7.2
degrees) compared to the transtibial control group (7.1 degrees) was not sig-
nificant (p=0.56).
Conclusions:
Increased LTPS is associated with increased risk of graft fail-
ure only in transportal ACLR, not in transtibial ACLR. Slope related graft strain
may be potentiated by anisometric ACL graft placement. Especially in paediat-
ric ACLR, where increased LTPS is found, non- isometric ACL graft placement
should be avoided.
No conflicts of interest reported
151.