Previous Page  106 / 245 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 106 / 245 Next Page
Page Background

106

· DOS Abstracts

Pedobar pressure and comfort in a mass produced

orthopaedic stiletto compared to a standard stiletto

and a sneaker. In the lab and in life

Jeannette Ø Penny, Merete Speedtsberg, Thomas Kallemose, Jesper Bencke

Dept of orthopeadics, University Hospital Hvidovre; Motion analysis lab,

University Hospital Hvidovre; Clinical Orthopaedic Research Hvidovre, University

Hospital Hvidovre; Motion analysis lab, University Hospital Hvidovre

Background:

Stilettos increases forefoot pressures and pain.

Purpose / Aim of Study:

Can an off-the-rack “orthopedic” stiletto alter pres-

sure and comfort scores in the forefoot and arch? Does anatomy have an influ-

ence?

Materials and Methods:

22 women, aged 21 to 61, shoe-size 38 (36 to 41)

had standardized X-rays and a clinical examination Three conditions tested: 8 cm

“orthopaedic” stiletto (OS) with built-in latex metatarsal lift and arch support;

same-height standard stiletto (SS) without inlays and a sneaker(SN) . 10 steps

analyzed. Peak Pressure (kPa) and Pressure-time integral (kPa/s) measured by

Novel Pedar-X pressure insoles. Each shoe-type worn 3 days. Mundermanns

comfort VAS recorded daily. P<0.05=*, p>0.01=**, p<0.001=***

Findings / Results:

Compared to SS the peak pressure under the 2+3 meta-

tarsals was reduced to 82% in the OS and 60% in the SN***. Under the first

metatarsal it was reduced to 73% and 40%, respectively***.Under the arch it

was similar for SN and OS and 30% lower for the SS*. Under the heel the OS was

27-28% lower than SS and SN***. Similar reductions were seen in the pressure-

time integrals, but with smaller difference between OS and SS**.and larger re-

ductions in the SN to 49% under 2+3 metatarsals***. For forefoot, arch and

heel, the comfort was rated highest for the SN*** and lowest for the SS**. No

statistical difference between OS and SS in the arch. For each mm the second

metatarsal was longer than the first, the pressure time integral rose 3 kPa/s)**

under the MT2+3* The VAS score dropped (less comfortable) 0.3 mm for each

kPa/s increase.

Conclusions:

A mass produced “orthopaedic” stiletto can alter foot pressures,

approaching those achieved in a sneaker and increase comfort for the user. An

increase in pressure-time integral under 2+3 metatarsals increases the discom-

fort and the pressure is increased in index-minus feet.

No conflicts of interest reported

57.