Previous Page  102 / 245 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 102 / 245 Next Page
Page Background

102

· DOS Abstracts

Non-union of displaced midshaft fractures of the

clavicle: A predictor model using pain scores.

Andreas Qvist, Michael Toft Væsel, Carsten Moss, Thomas Jakobsen, Steen Lund

Jensen

Orthopedic surgery, Randers Regional Hospital; Orthopedic surgery, Viborg

Regional Hospital; Orthopedic surgery, Randers Regional Hospital; Orthopedic

surgery, Aalborg University Hospital; Orthopedic surgery, Aalborg University

Hospital

Background:

Surgical treatment of displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle

reduces the risk of non-union, but provides no long-term benefits in functional

outcome scores. Treating all displaced fractures operatively with the purpose of

reducing non-union rates would lead to many unnecessary treatments (NNT=7).

Purpose / Aim of Study:

To identify early predictors for non-union in displaced

midshaft clavicular fractures and to develop a predictor model for non-union.

Materials and Methods:

We examined prospectively collected data on 64

non-operatively treated patients aged 18-60 years from a multicentre rand-

omized controlled trial. Odds ratios (OR) for various predictors were calculated

using logistic regression. For selected predictors we used receiver operating

characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to identify cut-off values for a predictor

model.

Findings / Results:

We identified 12 (19 %) patients with symptomatic non-

union. Failure to reduce pain VAS (pVAS) from week two to week four (OR

20.25, 95% CI 2.56 to 160.78, for no reduction in pain) and pVAS score at

week four (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.4 to 3.6, for each point increase) were predictors

of non-union. ROC curve analysis identified a reduction in pVAS at 50 per cent

as the cut-off value to predict non-union. The area under the ROC curve was

0.84 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.93). The predictor model identifies 22 (34 %) patients

at high risk of developing non-union. In the high risk group 11 (50%) patients

developed non-union whereas only one patient (3 %) in the low risk group de-

veloped non-union (p<0.0001).

Conclusions:

It is possible to identify patients at high risk of non- union using

changes in pVAS score from week two to week four combined with pVAS score

at week four following a displaced midshaft fracture of the clavicle. This finding

could lead to a new treatment algorithm for midshaft clavicular fractures.

No conflicts of interest reported

53.