

DOS Kongressen 2016 ·
99
Passive knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament
reconstruction using Endobutton or ToggleLoc with
ZipLoop as femoral fixation device – a comparison of
3175 patients from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction
Register
Christian Asmus Peter Asmussen, Mikkel Lindegaard Attrup, Kristian Thorborg,
Per Hölmich
Sports Orthopedic Research Center Copenhagen (SORC-C), Arthroscopic
Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital,
Amager-Hvidovre Denmark
Background:
Clinical and biomechanical studies show different results regard-
ing the stability and possible elongation of adjustable fixation devices. This has
lead to growing concern over the stability of ToggleLoc with ZipLoop used in
ACLR in vivo.
Purpose / Aim of Study:
This study aims to compare passive anterior knee
stability 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in pa-
tients where Endobutton or ToggleLoc with ZipLoop was used for graft fixation.
Materials and Methods:
Data from 3175 patients was included from the
Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Register between June 2010 and
September 2013. 2807 patients were operated with Endobutton and 368
were operated with ToggleLoc with ZipLoop. Data was retrieved from standard-
ized anterior cruciate ligament forms. Knee stability was evaluated using one of
two arthrometers – Rolimeter or KT1000 – and the pivot shift test.
Findings / Results:
ACLR with both fixation devices resulted in increased
knee stability (p < 0.001). A significant difference in mean postoperative an-
terior tibial translation between Endobutton (-1.25 mm, std. dev. 1.9 mm) and
ToggleLoc with ZipLoop operated patients (-0.83 mm, std. dev. 1.7 mm) was
found (p < 0.001). ToggleLoc with ZipLoop operated patients were found to
have a better preoperative (p < 0.001) and postoperative (p < 0.001) pivot
shift test score. Despite this, the level of improvement in pivot shift test scores
for both devices was similar (p = 0.188).
Conclusions:
Patients operated with ToggleLoc with ZipLoop have significantly
larger passive knee stability with less anterior tibial translation and better pivot
shift test scores 1 year after surgery. The use of either device is not expected
to produce any differences of clinical importance and, therefore, will not affect
the favorability of one device over the other.
No conflicts of interest reported
50.