Previous Page  130 / 225 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 130 / 225 Next Page
Page Background

130

· DOS Abstracts

Short-term result of a pyrocarbon implant in the TMC

joint for osteoarthritis

Allan Ibsen Sørensen

Clinic of Hand Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Background:

Different prostheses have been used for several decades in the

TCM joint with a high revision rate for some prostheses.

Purpose / Aim of Study:

To present short-term results of a Pyrocarbon im-

plant (Pyrocardan) in the trapezometacarpal joint (TMC).

Materials and Methods:

A pyro disc used as a spacer between first metacarpal

bone and trapezium bone. A cast used for 4 weeks followed by rehabilitation.

All patients were evaluated preoperatively, 6, 12 and 26 weeks postoperative-

ly and then yearly with ROM, grip strength, pinch, key-pinch, VAS scores for

pain, Quick- DASH and patients satisfaction. X-Ray performed preoperatively,

3 months postoperatively and thereafter yearly. Twenty-six patients operated

13 men and 13 woman. Mean age 60 years (45-79). Six additional operations

performed on other thumb, finger and wrist joints. One patient operated later

with arthrodesis in MP1 joint in same thumb.

Findings / Results:

Follow-up was 23 months (range 3-46). Radial abduction/

palmar abduction was preoperatively 38/38 degrees and at follow- up 41/41.

Opposition of thumb was 0 cm (0-3.5) versus 0.5 (0-5.5) postoperatively.

Grip strength in KgF preoperatively was 23 (range 6-50) and at follow-up 27

(7-48), p<0.05. Pinch/key-pinch (Kg) preoperatively 4.5/3.7 and at follow-up

5.0/5.6, (NS/NS). VAS pain (mm) was preop. at rest/activity: 48/80 and at fol-

low- up: 11/49, p<0.05. Radiographic migration of one implant. Quick DASH

preop.: 48 (16-86) and at follow-up; 28 (0-75) (p<0.01). Satisfaction (mm of

100) preop.: 20 (0-94) and at follow-up: 79 (5-100) (p<0.01). No infection.

One implant revised (3.8%).

Conclusions:

Short-term results with a pyrocarbon implant in the TMC joint

concerning pain, grip strength, Quick-DASH and patient satisfaction are favor-

able. Longer follow-up and a larger series of patients operated on with this new

technique is needed.

No conflicts of interest reported

82.