Previous Page  200 / 245 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 200 / 245 Next Page
Page Background

200

· DOS Abstracts

Strength testing following anterior cruciate

ligament reconstruction. A prospective cohort

study investigating redundancy of tests.

Kristoffer Weisskirchner Barfod

OrthoSport Victoria Research Unit, Deakin University and Epworth HealthCare,

Australia

Background:

Restoration of muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament

(ACL) tear is considered important in order to safely return to sport, but com-

prehensive strength testing protocols are often very time-consuming.

Purpose / Aim of Study:

The purpose of the study was to improve the ef-

ficiency of a strength testing protocol by investigating if some tests are re-

dundant and could be omitted when evaluating outcomes at 6 and 12 month

following ACL reconstruction.

Materials and Methods:

The study was performed as a prospective cohort

study following the STROBE guidelines. The following 4 strength tests were per-

formed using a HUMAC NORM Dynamometer: 1. Isokinetic concentric strength

at 60°/s, 2. Isokinetic concentric strength at 180°/s, 3. Isometric strength,

and 4. Isokinetic eccentric strength at 60°/s. The redundancy of strength tests

was investigated by fitting a linear regression model to the data. An R-squared

value above 0.75 was chosen to indicate redundancy.

Findings / Results:

The cohort consisted of 123 patients (74 male, 49 fe-

male) who completed 6 and 12 months follow up after ACLR. The comparison

of concentric peak force at 60deg/s and 180deg/s showed redundancy at both

6 and 12 months when looking at the limbs separately (R2=0.775 to 0.861).

The comparison of isometric and isokinetic peak force and concentric and ec-

centric peak force often showed borderline redundancy (R2=0.574 to 0.806).

No analyses of limb symmetry index showed redundancy.

Conclusions:

At 6 and 12 month following ACL reconstruction little extra in-

formation was generated by testing concentric strength at both 60deg/s and

180deg/s, as the measurements showed considerable redundancy with one

explaining approximately 90% of the other. To achieve a more time-efficient

testing protocol only one concentric speed should be included.

No conflicts of interest reported

151.