DOS Kongressen 2016 ·
195
High two-year revision rates after primary
knee arthroplasty – causes and implemented
interventions for improvement
Martin Lindberg-Larsen, Mette Hornsleth, Jens Bagger
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg
Background:
Data from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register (DKR) has re-
vealed high 2-year revision rates after primary knee arthroplasty performed in
2012 and 2013 in Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg.
Purpose / Aim of Study:
To investigate causes of early revisions in order to
implement a strategy for improvement of outcome after primary knee arthro-
plasty.
Materials and Methods:
A retrospective single center investigation of all pri-
mary knee arthroplasties performed in 2012 and 2013. During the first 15
months the Zimmer NexGen CR-Flex (n=225) was used as the standard pri-
mary knee prosthesis and in the remaining 9 months the DePuySynthes SIGMA
(n=158) was used. 17 uni- compartmental prosthesis were implanted.
Findings / Results:
197 primary knee arthroplasties were performed in 2012
and 21(10.7%) were revised within 2 years, whereas 203 were performed in
2013 and 22 (10.8%) were revised within 2 years. The main cause of early
revision was instability (n=20) resulting in 10 liner exchanges, 3 revisions of
femoral component to posterior stabilized and 7 total revision procedures. 6 of
the instability cases were fall-related and the remaining 14 were surgical proce-
dure related. Other main causes of early revision were aseptic loosening of the
tibial component (n=10) and secondary insertion of patella component (n=4).
Conclusions:
Some of the early revisions (liner exchanges) due to instability
could be explained by the learning curve after change of the standard pros-
thesis and a decrease in these revisions are expected with an increased intra-
operative focus on balancing. The revisions due to aseptic loosening have led
to a change in cementation technique of the tibial component. Finally, patella
resurfacing is now performed as a standard procedure. With implementation of
these interventions the early revision rate is expected to decrease significantly.
No conflicts of interest reported
146.