

DOS Kongressen 2017 ·
97
Passive range of motion and clinical cut-off point of in
ankle dorsiflexion are not correlated with gross motor
function in children with cerebral palsy – a cross sec-
tional study
Helle Mätzke Rasmussen, Joachim Svensson, Maria Thorning, Niels Wisbech
Pedersen, Søren Overgaard, Anders Holsgaard-Larsen
The Orthopedic Research Unit, 1) Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Trau-
matology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark 2) Department of Clinical Re-
search, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
Background:
The Cerebral Palsy follow Up Program (CPOP) uses cut-off points
(traffic light signals) to categorize passive range of motion (ROM) in: green, yel-
low and red in order to guide clinical decisions. The cut-off points are not evi-
dence based and potential relationship with gross motor capacity and patient-
reported gross motor function has never been established.
Purpose / Aim of Study:
To investigate ROM and the traffic light categories
for ankle dorsiflexion and their relationship with gross motor function in children
with cerebral palsy (CP).
Materials and Methods:
We conducted a cross-sectional study of 60 children
with spastic CP at GMFCS level I-II, aged 5-9 years. ROM were measured as
maximal ankle dorsiflexion with flexed and extended knee using goniometry and
the categories applied using the cut-off points provided by CPOP. Furthermore
1-min walking distance (1-min walk), Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM)
and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Cerebral Palsy Module: movement and
balance subscale (Pedsql) where collected. Correlations where investigated with
Pearson correlation coefficients. Differences in the three groups based on the
traffic light categories were investigated with one-way ANOVA.
Findings / Results:
No significant correlation (r2 < 0.2, p>0.05) where docu-
mented between ROM versus 1-min walk, GMFM and Pedsql. Furthermore, the
group mean values of the outcome measures in the traffic light categories did
not differ.
Conclusions:
Ankle dorsiflexion are not correlated with gross motor function,
why the cut-off points used in CPOP are of limited clinical value in relation to
gross motor capacity and patient-reported impairments in relation to move-
ment and balance. As a consequence ROM and gross motor function may be
considered as separate constructs, which may have impact on the decision-
making of treatment for the patient group.
No conflicts of interest reported
49.